ラベル 中国経営研究 の投稿を表示しています。 すべての投稿を表示
ラベル 中国経営研究 の投稿を表示しています。 すべての投稿を表示

27/04/2026

The reality of the spy camera industry supply chain in China

The reality of the spy camera industry supply chain in China

Facts revealed by Chinese state-controlled media (pdf, A4 x 1p)

Toshi SUGITA, Study Note (Japanese edition)

関連参考

・「中国における見えない目の脅威:盗聴・盗撮の実態と日本が直面する連鎖的課題」

杉田俊明コラム『世界経済評論』IMPACT(電子版、2026年4月13日付)掲載分

注:上記コラムは公刊版(当室教育研修関連資料の一部抜粋)。

・「中国が盗聴盗撮犯罪の実態を公表した本来の狙いは?」を含め、基になっている当研究室の教育研修資料シリーズは、関係者を対象に配信しています。

・上記研究ノートの中国語・華語版は後日、本欄にて掲載される予定。

13/04/2026

Spy cameras: The current situation in China and the challenges for Japan

「中国赴任における見えない目の脅威:盗聴・盗撮の実態と日本が直面する連鎖的課題」

杉田俊明執筆の上記コラムは『世界経済評論』IMPACT(電子版、2026年4月13日付)に掲載されました。

掲載先:http://www.world-economic-review.jp/impact/article4299.html

注1:上記アドレスをクリックすると、セキュリティ注意が表示される場合があります。刊行側雑誌社のサイトで問題はないと思われますが、気になる方は、当研究室サイト転載の同コラム(pdf ⇒右記リンク)より閲覧できます。

注2:上記掲載コラムは公刊版(当室教育研修関連資料の一部抜粋)。

基になっている教育研修資料シリーズは、関係者を対象に配信しています。

・中国における盗聴盗撮の実態・実例編

・中国当局が盗聴盗撮の事実を明かした背景

・盗聴盗撮関連対策編

・盗聴盗撮が日本に連鎖する課題(個人、企業、経済安全保障)など

なお、上記シリーズの抜粋部分の英語版、中国語・華語版は後日、本欄にて掲載される場合があります。

25/02/2026

中国の対日禁輸(一部の日本企業に対する実質的な制裁)などは「ワン」タイプ企業の増加を逆に招く?

◆中国による対日禁輸(一部の日本企業に対する実質的な制裁)などは「ワン」タイプ企業の増加を逆に招く?

「ワン」タイプ⇒アレクサンダー・ワン(Alexandr Wang/汪滔)氏タイプ、安保・理念重視型。「ワン」タイプを含め、諸類型の詳細については、

杉田俊明研究室のケース研究資料

「華人系米国人経営者の3類型からみる日本企業の戦略対策」(f)をご参照ください。


◆合わせて参考

杉田俊明論文「デリスキングとグローバルポートフォリオ:企業の戦略行動にみる『脱中国』の実態」、2024年2月刊(f)

杉田俊明コラム「経済安保の前線に立つ華人系米国人経営者たち:AI・半導体覇権を巡る相克と戦略」2026年1月19日付刊(f)


◆上記資料はいずれも杉田俊明研究室のウェブページにて掲載されています。

07/02/2026

Three Strategic Postures of Chinese-American Entrepreneurs Toward China

        Between Two Worlds:

Three Strategic Postures of Chinese-American Entrepreneurs Toward China

Toshiaki SUGITA

Professor of Strategy and Global Business, Emeritus, Konan Univ, Japan

The Struggle and Strategy for AI and Semiconductor Supremacy

Today, in global economic and security discourse, AI (artificial intelligence) and semiconductors have become the "most critical strategic resources" that determine a nation's fate. As the US-China power struggle intensifies and geopolitical fault lines threaten to tear apart the high-tech industry, examining the faces of those leading US companies reveals a telling fact: many of the executives driving national competitiveness and standing at the forefront of China's strategy are Chinese Americans.

In this era of the new Cold War, Chinese American executives do not all have the same distance from China, depending on their origins, generation, and business model. This column unpacks the sophisticated geopolitical intelligence of three visionary leaders—Alexandr Wang, Jensen Huang, and Morris Chang—to navigate the precarious divide between roots and national interest. Moreover, these analyses also reveal a multi-layered and resilient geopolitical strategy shaped by a shared intellectual tradition of the Chinese diaspora.

Alexander Wang: The Generation Z Hawk Taking on National Security

First, we turn our attention to Alexander Wang, co-founder of Scale AI and the darling of the AI world. At just 29 years old, he is a second-generation American citizen.

Mr Wang has built a platform that advances the labelling and processing of data essential for AI model learning. He has been involved in laying the groundwork for the use of AI in the military and intelligence fields. However, what is particularly noteworthy here is his clear identity and political stance.

With parents who emigrated from China and worked for US government agencies, he has repeatedly emphasised in public that he is an "American" and makes no secret of his stance as a defender of liberal democracy.

At a 2023 US Congressional committee hearing and in a 2025 open letter to President Trump, he asserted that "America must win the AI war." His concrete articulation of the threats posed by China's use of AI for social control and military applications transcended the role of a corporate executive, projecting the aura of a strategist.

For someone without lived experience in China, it represents less a "root" and more a "rival" threatening free competition. As of 2026, he leads Meta's development of "Super Intelligence" as Chief AI Officer, seemingly driven by a clear conviction that technological AI supremacy serves as a "shield" to protect American liberalism.

Jensen Huang: A "market-driven" figure trying to overcome regulatory tensions

In stark contrast to Wang's direct approach, Jensen Huang, who leads NVIDIA, must navigate complex manoeuvres. As a Taiwanese-American and the dominant force in GPUs – the 'heart' of the modern AI revolution – he wields influence over the global power balance.

For Huang, China is both a security "concern" and a "huge market" for generating revenue. In response to repeated US export restrictions on China, NVIDIA has persistently argued for maintaining its influence in the Chinese market, developing China-specific products in rapid succession – a response bordering on obsession.

Yet the reality is harsh. While US authorities tighten restrictions, China demands NVIDIA provide "proof of no backdoors" and promotes policies encouraging domestic firms to use homegrown chips.

The dilemma facing Mr Huang epitomises the process by which US-China decoupling is eroding the rationality of mutual dependence. Even he, who prioritises market principles, is inevitably buffeted by the tides of national policy and geopolitics, precisely because he possesses cutting-edge technology.

Morris Chang: The 'Strategic Architect' Transcending the Silicon Shield

Morris Chang, founder of TSMC, has maintained an overview of this conflicting dynamic, grasping it structurally. Born on the Chinese mainland, educated in the US, and having built his career at a major American semiconductor firm, his influence remains immense even after stepping back from the front lines of management.

The concept of the "Silicon Shield" symbolising TSMC was inherently security-conscious. Yet, while maintaining Taiwan as its base, Mr Chang strategically advanced the decentralisation of operations across the US, Japan, and Europe, elevating TSMC to an "indispensable presence" within a broader global context.

While avoiding direct political statements like Mr Wang and displaying an obsession with the market like Mr Huang, Mr Chang grasped the essence of China and global management more accurately. His skill in rapidly restructuring supply chains crystallises the long-term, multifaceted perspective characteristic of executives of the Chinese diaspora.

Roots and Realism: Why Their Strategies Diverge

While management strategy does reflect a leader's values and convictions, the differences in their approaches to China become starkly apparent when viewed through the lens of their respective backgrounds.

Mr Huang's fixation on maintaining market share can be seen as an expression of an optimistic frontier spirit, rooted in his purely cultivated success experience in the United States. Precisely because he has not experienced the political harshness of the mainland firsthand, his 'pragmatic intellect' functions, believing economic rationality can override geopolitics.

In stark contrast, Mr Chan's strategy, shaped by being born on the war-torn Chinese mainland and possessing a profound understanding of the Communist Party's governance, bears the imprint of cold historical lessons. His cunning posture, using Taiwan as a 'shield' to make the world dependent on his company, represents the pinnacle of 'structural intelligence' – a perspective only possible for someone who has crossed geopolitical lines of death.

For Mr Wang, a second-generation entrepreneur educated entirely in America, China is no longer even an object of nostalgia. It is merely a systemic adversary threatening the liberal democracy that defines his identity. His 'ideological intellect' leads to the stark conclusion: victory in an uncompromising 'AI war'.

Thus, behind their strategic decisions lies a cold realism shaped by their individual journeys, transcending mere business calculations.

Geopolitical intelligence at the core of management

While this article focuses on the three individuals mentioned above, numerous executives of the Chinese diaspora are at the pinnacle of the US semiconductor industry, including those at Intel, AMD, and Broadcom. Amid accelerating US-China decoupling, what they share is a "highly developed geopolitical intelligence" that derives optimal solutions amidst the conflicting vectors of roots, nation, and the global market.

They are not merely engineers or executives. They are solving a complex political-economic equation: how to transform cutting-edge technology into national power while simultaneously ensuring corporate sustainability.

The world does not move solely by the logic of technology and capital. Now that economic security has become a prerequisite for management, Japanese companies too must redefine their positions and build resilient strategies.

*********************************************************************************************************

Resources & Links

Original Publication:

Part of the content in this column was originally published in the January 19, 2026, issue of World Economic Review Impact (Japanese edition).

http://www.world-economic-review.jp/impact/article4171.html

Published edition pdf (Japanese edition): [Click here to access]

This English edition pdf: [Click here to access]

********************************************************************************************************

T Business Intelligence Lab

https://sites.google.com/toshibusinessintelligence.com/menu

30/01/2026

杉田俊明コラム「経済安保の前線に立つ華人系米国人経営者たち」

杉田執筆のコラムは『世界経済評論』IMPACT(電子版、2026年 1月19日付)に掲載されました。

「経済安保の前線に立つ華人系米国人経営者たち:AI・半導体覇権を巡る相克と戦略」

掲載コラムの雑誌社のアドレス:

http://www.world-economic-review.jp/impact/article4171.html

注1:上記アドレスをクリックすると、端末によってはセキュリティ注意が表示される場合があります。雑誌社のサイトで問題はないと思われますが、気になる方は、当研究室サイトに転載されているコラムを(下記アドレスをクリックし)直接閲覧してください。

「経済安保の前線に立つ華人系米国人経営者たち:AI・半導体覇権を巡る相克と戦略」

注2:上記は公刊版。基になっている企業・ビジネススクール版については、特定経営関係者、当研究室業務利用者、配信登録者、などを対象に別途配信しています。

注3:上記コラムの英語版、中国語・華語版は後日、本欄にて掲載される予定です。

10/09/2025

Column by Toshi Sugita "The multifaceted nature of China"

"The multifaceted nature of China as seen in the dispute following the death of a famous entrepreneur"

杉田俊明コラム「ある名物企業家死後の係争にみる中国の多面性」2025年7月28日付

・同コラムのpdf版を閲覧/印刷の場合は、⇒このリンク部分をクリック(f)

・原文を閲覧する場合は、「世界経済評論」IMPACTの下記アドレスをクリック

http://www.world-economic-review.jp/impact/article3912.html

なお、本コラムは一般公刊版(ダイジェスト版)。執筆者原稿記載の職称は「名誉教授」。

・企業内やビジネススクール用ケースメソッド参考資料(ダイジェスト版。上記公刊版の姉妹編)は下記のリンクをクリック

中国や中国企業の多面性:ケース「娃哈哈騒動」から学ぶ (pw-b)

・他 関連調査報告書やビジネススクール用ケースメソッド(完全版)は別途案内に基づいてご利用ください。

02/08/2025

Keynote speech "Strategy of Multinational Enterprises in the Trade War"

Professor Emeritus T.SUGITA delivered a keynote speech at the 17th National Conference of the Academy of Multinational Enterprises, Japan, July 12, 2025.

"Strategy of Multinational Enterprises in the Trade War: How to Correctly Recognise and Respond to the Multifaceted Nature of China and Chinese Companies"


杉田俊明「貿易戦争下の多国籍企業経営:"中国"や"中国企業"の多面性をどう捉え、どう対応すべきか」、多国籍企業学会第17回全国大会統一論題報告、2025年7月12日、於兵庫県立大学

関連資料は杉田俊明研究室のウェブページにて掲載中。